Thankfully the election is over and the American people can look forward to their leaders governing for a season before returning to full-scale re-election mode. While the economy continues to dominate headlines in both the Business and Politics sections of the paper, one of the most pressing issues facing the 113th Congress is comprehensive immigration reform. Election night demonstrated the growing power of Latino voters and the renewed demand for results on immigration policy.
One of the most decisive factors in President Barack Obama’s reelection on Tuesday night was the broad support of Latino voters across the nation. A full ten percent of the electorate in 2012 was Hispanic, and of those 71% voted for President Obama. Governor Mitt Romney managed to earn only 27% of the Latino vote.
Gary Segura, Professor of American Politics and Chair of Chicano/a Studies at Stanford University and Principal at Latino Decisions, notes that “The most historic thing in this election is that for the first time in history, the share of the national popular vote margin is smaller than the Latino vote margin. That means that if Latinos had evenly divided their vote between both Candidates, the outcomes would be reversed.”
“This is a defining moment for the Republican Party,” said GOP strategist Leslie Sanchez. “If Republicans don’t heed this warning, we are certainly in danger of becoming politically irrelevant at a national level.”
According to Matt Barreto of Latino Decisions, the Republican Party “will be doomed if they lose black and Latino votes by these same margins in the future.”
Here in North Carolina, Latinos comprise about 2.9% of the electorate – a small percentage overall but a number that is growing rapidly. In fact, the Latino vote has grown by 117% in NC from 2000 to 2010, compared to 52% nationally. In 2012 nearly three out of four North Carolina Latinos voted for President Obama, and while Governor Romney carried NC, his margin of victory was smaller than many people predicted in part because of strong Latino turnout.
In the weeks and months ahead, North Carolina will again see immigration policy taken up at the state level. Will our elected officials ignore all manner of economic data and business sense in taking us down the losing path blazed by Arizona and Alabama, or will they refuse to let the ideological zealotry of a few right-wingers dominate decisions that will have far reaching implications for the future competitiveness of our state? We have seen other Southern neighbors try the “attrition through enforcement” model, and they are already reaping the consequences and in some cases, publicly regretting their actions. A far better approach would be to build our communities through immigrant integration.
The NC Council of Churches believes that we should implement humane comprehensive immigration reform because it is, simply, the right thing to do. Our Scriptures call us to treat our new neighbors with respect, dignity and love – something we can’t do when families are being ripped apart and workers live in the shadows.
Yet we are also realists, and we know that politics is usually dominated by the twin gods of the bottom-line: money and votes. So to every elected official in North Carolina, Republican and Democrat, from the state house in Raleigh to the halls of Congress in Washington DC: If you won’t support comprehensive immigration reform because it’s the right thing to do, at least support it because there is no future for our state or for your political party without Latinos and the children of immigrants from across the world.
-Chris Liu-Beers, Program Associate
Ok, I stand corrected. I do believe the approach that President Bush proposed was the sensible approach. It called for the registration of illegal immigrants to a status of guest workers, and tightening up the US border with Mexico.
As I recall, it was President Bush offered comprehensive immigration reform, and it was the Democrats that fought this plan. This reality goes contrary to your narrative.
Actually, this reality that you mention is a key part of the story:
You are correct that President Bush worked for comprehensive immigration reform. His plan was opposed by members of both parties, though many more Republican senators voted against it than did Democrats. Here’s a quote from a Reuters story immediately following the vote: