• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
NC Council of Churches

NC Council of Churches

Strength in Unity, Peace through Justice

Get Involved Donate
  • About
    • Overview
    • Staff
    • Members
    • Covenant Partners
    • Statements
    • Board
    • Careers
  • Voices
  • Our Priorities
    • Partners in Health & Wholeness
      • The PHW Collaborative
      • Focus Areas
    • Eco-Justice Connection
      • Faith
      • Advocacy
      • Energy
      • Environmental Justice
      • Food
      • Global
      • Health
      • Resiliency and Restoration
    • Racial Justice
      • Confederate Monument Removal
      • Reparations to Restoration
    • Criminal Justice Reform
      • Cash Bail Reform
      • Death Penalty Abolition
    • Gun Violence Prevention
    • Workers’ Rights
      • Paid Sick Leave / Paid Family Leave
      • Raising Wages
    • Overdose Response
    • Legislative Advocacy
    • Healthcare Justice
    • Farmworkers
    • Public Education
  • In the News
    • NCCC in the News
    • Press Releases
  • Events
  • Resources

Search NC Council of Churches

The Case for Fair Taxes

November 27, 2012 by Justin Hubbard, Former Duke Divinity School Intern

Photo of a dollar bill
Photo by Flickr member: iChaz

Earlier this month, I went to vote at our local middle school in North Durham. It was one those winter-tease days, colder than usual, a glimpse of the coming months in North Carolina. As I walked into the school’s auditorium, I was met by poll monitors with visible breath and bundled-up like Ralphie’s brother from the movie A Christmas Story. For a Midwesterner, cold temperatures in North Carolina is a warm day in the fall, nonetheless, it was clear the monitors as well as voters were uncomfortable and frustrated with the conditions. While searching for my name in the voter list, I overheard one monitor pleading with an administrator to get the heat turned on, fearing the cold atmosphere might shoo voters away.

When I left the facility, I couldn’t help but wonder at the irony of the situation. In a crucial election with many issues at stake, including tax fairness, our local voting facility struggled to provide reasonable and comfortable conditions for the voters. It might be unfair to assume that the lack of heat in the earlier morning hours is related to the school’s budget, and subsequently, tax revenue. Perhaps the custodian simply forgot to turn it on. But, as national, state, and local governments continue to cut back on budgets and programs due to the lingering recession’s effects on revenue, the public sector and often those in lower-income neighborhoods are taking the brunt of tax policies and restructuring.

In the wake of the election season, the issue of taxation continues to be at the center of political discourses and debates, most recently laden with fears of the fiscal cliff. No one likes to pay taxes. No one likes to see that chunk of money taken out of their paycheck, or to arrive at a cash register only to find an increase in the price of their goods due to a sales tax. However, as a system put in place to assist with the provision of public services, taxes are necessary to provide for the well-being of individuals and communities in a given locality, state or country. Whether public education, safety, or roads, there is a lot we take for granted in a culture that often asserts a “don’t tread on me” ethos, an individualistic proclamation of entitlement that ignores the importance of fair tax policies and ultimately neglects the most vulnerable voices and bodies that bear the burden of unjust policies.

Susan Pace Hamill, a Professor at the University of Alabama’s School of Law has recently argued for tax reform based on Judeo-Christian ethics after exposing the unjust tax structure that exploits and oppresses the marginalized in her home state. In her book, The Least of These: Tax Reform and the Moral Duty of Christians, she argues that a well-orchestrated tax structure “should raise adequate revenues to meet the needs of the community subject to the tax and spread out the burden of paying the tax in an equitable or fair manner.” Though Alabama’s unjust taxation holds its own unique challenges, there is concern in light of recent proposed policies and legislation already passed (see “A new loophole for businesses will cost state 336 million a year”) that North Carolina is headed down a similar, uneven path.

A new report by the North Carolina Justice Center (NCJC) highlights recent proposals in personal income and sales tax policies meant to modernize North Carolina’s revenue system. However, this study exposes the economic assumptions behind these policies and questions their ability to respond adequately to the growing need for public investment and services while retaining its principles of equity, adequacy and stability. Most concerning are the proposals by policymakers that suggest eliminating the personal income tax or replacing the current progressive income tax with a flat personal income tax rate…Doing so would require all but the highest-income North Carolinians to pay a higher effective tax rate and would undermine the state’s economic growth in both the short and long terms.” Moreover, in order to increase the revenue from other sources, these policies advocate for increases in consumption-taxes, such as the sales tax. The report argues:

The sales tax is often mischaracterized as a “fair” tax in debates around tax policy. Proponents argue that the sales tax affects everyone equally because the tax on an item is the same no matter who buys it. But actually, it is the very claim of “equality” upon which sales taxes fail the test of fairness. The cost and sales tax on a bottle of laundry detergent is the same for a high-income person and a low-income person. But the rich person has many times more income, and thus the amount of tax paid on the      bottle of laundry detergent is much less significant an expense (i.e., a smaller share of their income) than it is for the middle- or low-income person. Furthermore, the sales tax is not levied on every single transaction that takes place in the economy. While the sale of many tangible goods is subject to tax, far fewer services are included. Low- income families are likely to spend a larger share of their incomes on tangible goods and taxable services than high-income families are, further reinforcing the   disproportionate impact of sales taxation on low-income families and individuals.

Consequently, the combination of a change in the current progressive personal income tax to a flat-rate, or worse, elimination of the tax altogether, plus an increase in consumption tax, places a heavy burden on low-income individuals and families. Instead of encouraging and providing avenues out of economic inequality, these policies will keep them confined to economic immobility or worse, further press against them and increase their burden.

The challenge to faith communities is not to deduct a set of moral principles from scripture that houses a model for a fair tax system. There are no formulas or bureaucratic maps that arise out of biblical texts that we might apply to our current context and tax system that will magically make the system fair. Rather, the biblical texts provide a framework to understand the Christian witness towards the common good and a Christian ethic of love and care for the vulnerable and exploited. Within the Old Testament texts we read of the economic practices in ancient Israel that seek distributive justice and equality throughout the community and beyond, as well as, the exacting prophetic voices that confront economic injustice. These themes are enriched by the New Testament’s continued admonishment against the accumulation of wealth (“tax collectors” were admonished for unjust practices for the sake of their wealth, not for their vocation itself), concern for “widow and orphan,” and advocacy for a subversive posture in order to initiate broader change in societal structures.

Perhaps what is most needed is a broader and more robust understanding of the “common good” and the “we” that makes up the place in which a theological understanding of the common good inhabits.  “We,” you, me, strangers from different backgrounds travel the same roads, ride the same buses, buy the same essential goods. On this side of the eschaton and in this particular place and moment, we seek the welfare of Babylon despite its imperial rule through the best and most just means. Currently, this involves the contribution to the welfare of the city or state through taxation. Even still, it is easy to neglect one another, and even easier to fail to see those that fall to the margins of the society, cold and weary from neglect and systemic injustice; shivering even as we attempt to participate in a political process that often fails too often to contribute equally to the common good. In these tense economic and political times, it is easy to seek the welfare of one’s most immediate surroundings, family, and community, at the cost of those less proximate, less encountered, less seen. So as to avoid heading down the road from Jerusalem to Jericho, ignoring the shivering and battered bodies along the tax-sustained roadside, faith communities should act as the Good Samaritan, repairing the wounds inflicted by the unjust tax system by advocating for fair tax policies.

–Justin Hubbard, Duke Divinity School Intern

 

Filed Under: Blog Tagged With: Economic Justice, Good Government, State Budget, Taxes

About Justin Hubbard, Former Duke Divinity School Intern

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Frank Burns says

    December 4, 2012 at 4:07 pm

    Justin,
    I don’t know how much you want to research human behavior with regards to spending. If you are a parent you would understand completely. When a child has to use their own money, all of a sudden buying those things does not hold the same level of importance.

    Go to a hospital emergency room and take a look at all the people who got there to get medicine for minor things, just cause they can. It doesn’t cost them anything.

    It’s the same way with taxes, if citizens don’t pay, they don’t care about cost. This results in wasted resources.

    Reply
  2. Justin says

    November 29, 2012 at 12:28 pm

    Thanks for your comment Frank and taking the time to read the post. I want to reiterate that the argument is not to get rid of personal income tax, but make it more progressive, adding “a new income-bracket” to align better with the ability to pay. Ability to pay is key to the argument. I admit and I apologize that might have not been clear, but the reports I based the post off of are related to the personal income state tax and sales tax. On the other hand, state income tax is of course tied to federal income tax. So your question is important to consider. I just found a brief from NCJC regarding the federal tax debate here which might be the best response:
    http://www.ncjustice.org/sites/default/files/BTC%20Brief%20-%20Who%20Pays%20-%202012update.pdf

    Report argues, “Americans who did not pay federal income taxes are front and center in this debate. While an estimated 46 percent of Americans did not pay federal income tax in 2011, they contributed a very significant amount in other federal, state, and local taxes. Among those households that paid no federal income tax, twothirds paid payroll taxes. And of those households that did not pay payroll taxes, 22 percent were seniors and 17 percent were students, people with disabilities and those who lost their jobs (See Figure 1). Every household pays taxes. Even the poorest fifth of American households paid an average of one-sixth (16 percent) of their total income in federal, state, and local taxes in 2009.”

    “Limiting the discussion to federal taxes distorts the facts about who pays taxes. That’s because low- and middle-income families pay a greater share of their incomes in state and local taxes than high-income families. Only two states require their best-off residents to pay as much of their incomes in state and local taxes as their very poorest taxpayers pay.”

    So, in a way I don’t necessarily disagree with you completely. Everyone should pay something and the report indicates this. It does get tricky with federal income tax, but this also needs to take account the ability to pay. An individual making $20,000 will have a greater portion of their income go to necessities in goods and services, leaving little room for investment in things like education that might lead to greater economic opportunity. Tax credits do help low-income individuals and families and help align tax rate with their ability to pay. I am taking a stance and clearly stating that I think there is responsibility, given the disparity in wealth in our country, to provide such initiatives while thinking critically and creatively about policy programs and reform.

    Your question on “incentive” among those citizens to be concerned with wasted expenditures might require further research on my part. The report in my post highlights a few assumptions made about personal income tax and individual decisions made at home, work, and investment, and also calls for further research. I think implicit in this is your question of “incentive” and more comprehensive research is needed to respond adequately.

    Reply
  3. Frank Burns says

    November 28, 2012 at 12:46 pm

    All citizens should pay some taxes and that includes federal income tax. Currently amost half of the population pays no federal income tax and many even receive refunds despite not paying anything due to the system of federal credits. To have a fair tax system, it must include everybody. Otherwise with almost one half the population not being taxed, there is no incentive among those citizens to challenge our government to show wisdom in spending those tax receipts. Wasted expenditures would not be a concern with those citizens. People are represented but not taxed. We need to all be in the boat together. You might reply that those citizens do pay sales taxes and social security taxes, which is true but so does everybody else. Certainly those at the lower end of the income scale should pay less but they should all pay something.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Footer

Contact

NC Council of Churches
27 Horne St.
Raleigh, NC 27607
(919) 828-6501
info@ncchurches.org

Subscribe

Click here to subscribe to newsletters and blog updates.
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2023 NC Council of Churches · All Rights Reserved · Website by Tomatillo Design · Hosted by WP Engine